From working student to consulting director in SAP consulting

26. June 2024

Maximilian Thür began his career at cbs in July 2015 as a working student in Corporate Sales and Marketing in Heidelberg. During this time, he wrote his master’s thesis at the company and had his first contact with SAP by becoming more deeply involved in consulting in the finance context. It then quickly became clear to him that he wanted to develop further with the trainee program, which he started in October 2016 in the Finance department. Max had already been interested in consulting beforehand, but this only really took shape during his time as a working student. He is now a Consulting Director in Finance and Controlling and has already been able to bring several groundbreaking projects to a successful conclusion at cbs.

From trainee to Consulting Director

After successfully completing the trainee program, Max was quickly integrated into the project at the high-tech company TRUMPF near Stuttgart. The focus here was on harmonizing the global structures in the finance department. He was promoted to Senior Consultant when he led the project as team leader. The project took him to China, Japan, Switzerland and the USA, where he successfully carried out two go-live implementations.

Immediately afterwards, he started a new project at MAN Truck & Bus in Munich, where he was promoted to manager and took over the project management for the S/4HANA preliminary project “ONE Finance”. This project included the migration of the MAN T&B production system. In the flagship project with SCHOTT in Mainz, he led the Finance & Controlling team. The international glass technology specialist switched from the old SAP environment to the new, digital S/4HANA world. This transformation digitalized the processes and enabled system-supported, forward-looking analyses – worldwide in all countries and companies. Max took over the program management a little later in the project and was also responsible for the steering committee. In addition to these large projects, he was also involved in smaller transformation projects. Since December 2021, he has been responsible as program manager and on the steering committee at Blanc & Fischer. The successful S/4HANA go-live took place in April of this year. He is currently working with Oliver Dorsner, member of the Executive Board, on the Giesecke+Devrient S/4 transformation project, which is due to go live in 2025.

Every project is unique, as you always have to deal with different personalities and industries.
Maximilian Thür, Consulting Director

Building and leading a team

During his time at cbs, he built up a team in Heidelberg that now consists of eight employees. Together with Sebastian Hellmann, he is responsible for the Finance department and contributes to the project organization with CEO Rainer Wittwen and Susanne Kappauf.

People, passion and innovation

As a consultant to global market leaders, you are constantly dealing with challenging, new and interesting topics. That’s exactly what motivates Max. When he decided to work as a student trainee at cbs, he was enthusiastic about the people and the fields of activity.

When the customers are happy and you’re happy too, that’s something really great.

This means that every day is different, but at the same time you experience progress from day to day. The dynamic nature of the business, which is influenced by external factors, ensures constant change and makes the work exciting. Such factors include ESG (Environmental, Social and Corporate Governance), i.e. the framework conditions for taking environmental, sustainability and social issues into account within companies, or the influence of artificial intelligence on the business world.

In the business context, there are always different requirements, which is why the daily work always remains challenging. He also says that it is worth the effort and energy when you work for years towards a point in time such as the go-live of a project and the success ultimately pays off. That is something special. The Schott S/4HANA project left a lasting impression on Max, as it was considered a groundbreaking pioneering project. Many things were implemented that had never been done before, such as the retroactive introduction of margin analysis and the historic change of the leading fiscal year variant. It was an arduous but definitely worthwhile journey, he says.

For me, the Power of Orange is the employees and working together.

The open-door culture, the way of working together

Since it started almost 10 years ago, the company has grown from around 300 to around 1,300 employees worldwide, and both Max and the company itself have undergone remarkable development. It is the culture and the people that make cbs what it is. For him, the “Power of Orange” symbolizes the strength and cooperation of the employees as well as the open corporate culture that he experiences every day at cbs. He also remembers past events, which are something special every year. This also shows how big cbs has become and how well the network works.

Related articles
When a merger, acquisition, or divestiture is announced, the spotlight is usually on the strategic story. Market expansion. Portfolio optimisation. Synergies. Shareholder value. Behind closed doors, deal teams are working intensely on valuation models, legal structures, and regulatory approvals. Leadership teams focus on how the new organisation will operate once the transaction is complete. Technology rarely sits at the centre of these discussions. And yet, once the deal is signed, it often becomes the hardest problem to solve. Where the real complexity begins In large enterprises, ERP systems sit at the centre of how the organisation actually runs. Finance reporting, procurement, supply chain operations, manufacturing processes, and compliance controls are all deeply connected through the same digital core. Over time, these systems evolve into highly integrated environments. Multiple legal entities may share the same ERP instance. Business units that look independent on an organisational chart may rely on shared data structures, reporting frameworks, and operational processes inside the same system landscape. This works well when the organisation remains intact. It becomes far more complicated when the structure of the business changes. When a company sells a division, spins off a business unit, or acquires another organisation, those shared systems suddenly need to be separated, replicated, or reorganised. Data structures that support several entities may need to be redesigned. Reporting environments must remain stable even as the underlying systems change. And this often needs to happen under strict deal timelines. Why ERP challenges appear late One reason ERP complexity catches organisations by surprise is timing. In many transactions, technology teams are brought into the conversation only after the deal structure is already defined. By that point, legal agreements are signed, Day-One deadlines are set, and the operational expectations of the new organisation are already clear. What becomes visible at that stage is the gap between the business structure of the deal and the technical reality of the systems that support it. Separating a business entity on paper may take weeks. Separating it inside an ERP system can take months if the dependencies are not fully understood. When technology risk becomes business risk This is where technology stops being a purely IT concern. If ERP systems cannot be separated cleanly, finance reporting may be affected. Regulatory obligations may become harder to fulfil. Supply chains and operational processes may experience disruption. Integration timelines can extend far beyond what deal teams originally expected. In other words, ERP complexity can quickly become a business continuity risk. This does not mean that mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures are inherently problematic from a systems perspective. Organisations execute these changes successfully every year. But the most successful programmes share a common mindset. They recognise early that enterprise systems are not just operational tools. They are structural components of the business itself. Treating ERP as part of the deal strategy When ERP landscapes and enterprise data structures are considered earlier in the transaction process, organisations gain much greater control over execution. Dependencies between business entities become visible sooner. Separation or integration scenarios can be evaluated earlier. Technology teams can design approaches that protect operational continuity while still supporting the strategic intent of the deal. This shift in thinking is becoming increasingly important. Modern ERP environments support far more than financial accounting. They underpin operational processes, regulatory reporting, supply chain coordination, and increasingly the data foundations that support analytics and AI. Changing the structure of the business inevitably means changing the structure of the systems that run it. For organisations navigating mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures, the real question is no longer just how to close the deal. It is how to execute the change without destabilising the systems that keep the business running. Over the coming weeks, the ONE.Ascent campaign will explore how enterprises approach ERP change during structural events such as mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, and what separates high-risk programmes from those executed with confidence. Continue the Conversation If your organisation is navigating a merger, acquisition, carve-out, or divestiture, join our upcoming ONE.Ascent executive webinar where we explore the practical realities of managing ERP change during structural transformation. Register for the session or explore the ONE.Ascent campaign hub to see how enterprises across the Asia Pacific are approaching modernisation with greater clarity and control.
Insight
The Hidden ERP Risk in M&A: Why Technology Becomes the Hardest Part After the Deal
Read More
14. March 2026
Insight
Modernisation Fatigue Is Real. Clarity Is the Competitive Advantage.
Read More
23. February 2026
Insight
Enterprise Modernisation Is Fragmented – That’s the Real Risk
Read More
23. February 2026