NEXT ONE Finance: Driver for digital transformation

18. August 2023

In a dynamic business environment, new technologies and capabilities are needed to stay ahead. Can finance and IT enable the company to position itself for the future? Can efficient governance and innovation be combined in an agile, end-to-end SAP ERP system in a timely manner?

Finance is one of the main drivers of digital transformation. After all, effective management has always been crucial for corporate success, even more so in times of rising costs and a slowing economy. It is essential to react quickly to external factors and to be able to make well-founded decisions adapted to the current company and market conditions.

This can only be achieved with a global, harmonized and standardized SAP enterprise platform. This platform must be also increasingly flexible and capable of being expanded with novel functionalities. New requirements are constantly arising from the socio-political and economic context. From 2024, for example, a CO2 reporting obligation will apply to companies in the EU. As a result, we see the innovation of the “green ledger” in the finance environment, which records ESG data in accounting terms with the help of finance structures. Rapid decisions in the increasingly complex value chain are also almost exclusively supported by a modern finance department.

 

Innovation meets Transformation

Finance needs to combine efficient governance with innovation in an agile, end-to-end business process platform in a future-oriented way. Our strategy to achieve this is encapsulated in the NEXT ONE Finance approach. At the core of NEXT ONE Finance lies ONE Finance, which standardizes the structures of operative accounting and management accounting. Creating uniform reporting structures and dimensions forms the basis for an agile implementation of innovative NEXT ONE Finance building blocks.

This standardized core ensures future viability to support key innovation drivers. In the NEXT ONE Finance target picture, topics with maximum impact are implemented early. This frontloads the value-add and enables companies to react in a targeted and agile manner to changes in the market that influence the value proposition.

next-one-finance

The cbs approach always considers the current position of the company as an input variable to tailor the necessary content of the NEXT ONE Finance portfolio. This helps identify current challenges and implement solutions for them in the short and medium term.

For that, we continuously assess the latest SAP products, gauging their potential advantages, market maturity, long-term viability, and significance for corporate governance. Expert knowledge and experience are paramount here. A significant, value-creating innovation is, for example, Universal Parallel Accounting, which forms the technical basis for mapping additional valuation views and dimensions for the entire supply chain in the finance results. This is used to implement the green ledger, or group valuation, separating the legal requirements from an internal view. Without Universal Parallel Accounting, this would only be possible with additional business functions and only to a limited extent.

 

Managing Innovation

In the realm of major transformation projects, such as the transition to SAP S/4HANA, the first step is to develop a long-term target picture that maps the strategic and functional requirements of the company. It is important to acknowledge the technical side of things and implementation feasibility, as well as to adopt a holistic outlook. One should not focus on singular facets like, for example, the introduction of a New General Ledger. Rather, at the beginning of the NEXT ONE Finance Journey, the question is how the corporate strategy can be made measurable and how an SAP system should be set up in terms of structures and functionalities to support the implementation of the strategy. From such a management performance system or control model, a target picture can be generated for the ultimate building stage of the system landscape, which outlines the requirements for internal and external accounting, as well as supply chain management.

For the implementation of large transformation projects, an agile procedural model has been established in which the roadmap is divided into realistic steps or phases. When planning these steps, it’s crucial to account for transformational task interdependencies along the timeline and actively manage expectations within the IT team and the business division.

One of our large industrial customers is currently in the first phase of the transition to SAP S/4HANA with a greenfield approach. In the first step, a solid ONE Finance basic structure is being created, leading to a harmonized system and process landscape that includes the entire value chain. Building on this stable structure, the company will implement further innovations in the subsequent phases, such as Group Valuation, Closing Cockpit, Intercompany Reconciliation and Margin Analysis.

It is always important to monitor the organization’s capacities while maintaining rapid progress. Through our many years of experience and our Selective Data Transition approach, we move our clients forward and achieve rapid added value for them. This is imperative, as stagnation could swiftly relegate you to the rear of the innovation cycle while competitors move ahead.

Where do you and your finance division currently stand on the path to digital transformation? Become a pioneer of digitalization and combine innovation and transformation to gain decisive competitive advantages. We are passionate about supporting you in developing the next generation of business solutions and transferring them swiftly into corporate reality. How can we help you? Get in touch with us.

Ihr Kontakt

Sebastian Hellmann

Consulting Director

Sebastian Hirthammer-Naoum

Senior Manager
Related articles
oneascent-m&a-image-4
Insight
A Safer Way to Manage ERP Change During M&A
Read More
14. March 2026
oneascent-m&a-image-3
Insight
Why ERP Systems Make Divestitures and Carve-Outs So Difficult
Read More
14. March 2026
When a merger, acquisition, or divestiture is announced, the spotlight is usually on the strategic story. Market expansion. Portfolio optimisation. Synergies. Shareholder value. Behind closed doors, deal teams are working intensely on valuation models, legal structures, and regulatory approvals. Leadership teams focus on how the new organisation will operate once the transaction is complete. Technology rarely sits at the centre of these discussions. And yet, once the deal is signed, it often becomes the hardest problem to solve. Where the real complexity begins In large enterprises, ERP systems sit at the centre of how the organisation actually runs. Finance reporting, procurement, supply chain operations, manufacturing processes, and compliance controls are all deeply connected through the same digital core. Over time, these systems evolve into highly integrated environments. Multiple legal entities may share the same ERP instance. Business units that look independent on an organisational chart may rely on shared data structures, reporting frameworks, and operational processes inside the same system landscape. This works well when the organisation remains intact. It becomes far more complicated when the structure of the business changes. When a company sells a division, spins off a business unit, or acquires another organisation, those shared systems suddenly need to be separated, replicated, or reorganised. Data structures that support several entities may need to be redesigned. Reporting environments must remain stable even as the underlying systems change. And this often needs to happen under strict deal timelines. Why ERP challenges appear late One reason ERP complexity catches organisations by surprise is timing. In many transactions, technology teams are brought into the conversation only after the deal structure is already defined. By that point, legal agreements are signed, Day-One deadlines are set, and the operational expectations of the new organisation are already clear. What becomes visible at that stage is the gap between the business structure of the deal and the technical reality of the systems that support it. Separating a business entity on paper may take weeks. Separating it inside an ERP system can take months if the dependencies are not fully understood. When technology risk becomes business risk This is where technology stops being a purely IT concern. If ERP systems cannot be separated cleanly, finance reporting may be affected. Regulatory obligations may become harder to fulfil. Supply chains and operational processes may experience disruption. Integration timelines can extend far beyond what deal teams originally expected. In other words, ERP complexity can quickly become a business continuity risk. This does not mean that mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures are inherently problematic from a systems perspective. Organisations execute these changes successfully every year. But the most successful programmes share a common mindset. They recognise early that enterprise systems are not just operational tools. They are structural components of the business itself. Treating ERP as part of the deal strategy When ERP landscapes and enterprise data structures are considered earlier in the transaction process, organisations gain much greater control over execution. Dependencies between business entities become visible sooner. Separation or integration scenarios can be evaluated earlier. Technology teams can design approaches that protect operational continuity while still supporting the strategic intent of the deal. This shift in thinking is becoming increasingly important. Modern ERP environments support far more than financial accounting. They underpin operational processes, regulatory reporting, supply chain coordination, and increasingly the data foundations that support analytics and AI. Changing the structure of the business inevitably means changing the structure of the systems that run it. For organisations navigating mergers, acquisitions, or divestitures, the real question is no longer just how to close the deal. It is how to execute the change without destabilising the systems that keep the business running. Over the coming weeks, the ONE.Ascent campaign will explore how enterprises approach ERP change during structural events such as mergers, acquisitions, and divestitures, and what separates high-risk programmes from those executed with confidence. Continue the Conversation If your organisation is navigating a merger, acquisition, carve-out, or divestiture, join our upcoming ONE.Ascent executive webinar where we explore the practical realities of managing ERP change during structural transformation. Register for the session or explore the ONE.Ascent campaign hub to see how enterprises across the Asia Pacific are approaching modernisation with greater clarity and control.
Insight
The Hidden ERP Risk in M&A: Why Technology Becomes the Hardest Part After the Deal
Read More
14. March 2026